The Rise of Economic Liberalism and the Analysis of Modern Globalization
In an globalized universe, the discourse on globalisation is often situated at the crossroads of divergent opinions on freedom and equity. The book by the author Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet opposed to globalization itself, aims to redefine the limits of a modern humanism through the filter of organic interactions as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By denouncing artificial transactions that strengthen current structures of injustice and vulnerability, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to highlight the flaws of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its beginnings can be identified back to the propositions of the economist Ricardo, whose objective was to enable the England to expand its global trade power. However, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has transformed into a tool of domination by High Finance, characterized by the growth of economic liberalism. Contrary to popular belief supported by economic consensus, Junon Moneta proves that the neoliberal system is truly a structure based on old customs, dating back to four and a half millennia.
The questioning also extends to the conduct of the EU, considered as a succession of compromises that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites rather than protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations opposed to a democratic mandate, is contested. The recent crises, whether economic or governmental, have only intensified the skepticism of Moneta about the Union’s capacity to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while acknowledging the historical errors that have brought about the present state, does not stop at criticism but also proposes responses aimed at reframing Union strategies in a human-centered and fair outlook. The need for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a central theme that runs through the whole text.
The text ventures more in depth into the analysis of the power structures that govern international economic flows. The exploration encompasses the method in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a limited number of financial influencers, generally at the cost of the many. This financial oligarchy, coordinated via organizations like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the global monetary system, imposes a excessive domination on global financial decisions.
The writer reveals how these institutions, under the guise of monetary management and security, have historically manipulated financial markets and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, opposite to a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is considered as a domination system, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical about the administration of the single currency, the analyst presents the European single currency not as a means of unification and stability, but more as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The adoption of the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that sidelined populations from political decisions, while exacerbating internal differences within the Union.
The repercussions of these strategies appear in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a long period of austerity that has eroded standards of living throughout the European territory. The thinker insists that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the European Union stays exposed to potential disruptions, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the book calls for a democratic revolution where EU peoples take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, including increased transparency in decision-making processes and authentic democratic engagement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
Reference text about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The essayist suggests that the answer resides in a renewal of democratic engagement, where decisions are made and applied in a way that truly reflects the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.